Going on the Offensive?
Paul Eidelberg

When Menachem Begin signed the Camp David Accords in September 1978, and followed this up by signing the Israel-Egypt peace treaty of March 1979, he initiated Israel’s defensive and losing strategy.

Let’s face a simple but unpleasant truth: Only a fool surrenders land won in a war of self-defense to the aggressor—surrenders land for what Anwar Sadat mockingly called “a piece of paper.”

Without firing a shot, Sadat won the greatest victory in military or diplomatic history. From an adversary superior in arms he regained the entire Sinai, including its strategic air bases built by Israel, and oil fields Israel had made productive. Begin surrendered all this—a twelve billion dollar infrastructure—for verbiage!

Sadat also manipulated Begin into abandoning the Jewish settlement of Yamit. This surrender infected Israel’s mentality with the pathological policy of “land for peace.” If this were not enough, Sadat conned Begin into signing the first international agreement that referred to Judea and Samaria as the “West Bank.”

Say what you will about Begin’s virtues, he didn’t really know what he was doing at Camp David. This pretty much sums up the story of his colleagues and successors to this day. Connect the dots: from Begin at Camp David to Bibi at the Begin-Sadat Center at Bar-Ilan University, where Netanyahu renounced the Jewish people’s biblical as well as legal claim to Judea and Samaria.

The State of Israel has been led by losers since the IDF’s miraculous victory in the June 1967 Six-Day War. It had to be miraculous, since it was achieved without the any thought or intention to incorporate Judea and Samaria into the State;! In fact, that bold but logical idea was opposed by Israel’s timid and myopic leaders. No wonder they ceded control of Israel’s holiest site, the Temple Mount, to the Arabs—who were stunned by this gesture of the conquerors.

The word “gesture” tells it all. Israel’s ruling elites think they can obtain peace through “gestures,” like yielding strategic assets for parchment—nay, for less than parchment, as witness the hero who retreated from Gaza for nothing. Let’s face it: Using a term coined by Lenin, we have to admit that for more than four decades this country has been ruled by “useful idiots,” whose mindless behavior was facilitated by Israel’s inane system of government—a system that allowed Ariel Sharon to nullify the 2003 Knesset elections and become Labor’s surrogate prime minister!

Let’s stop the pseudo-sophistication, the obscurantism: It’s not the Arabs but Jewish prime ministers that have laid the foundations for a Palestinian state.

And it makes no difference which party or party leader or party coalition heads Israel’s government: you get the same suicidal policy: retreat and surrender. Barack Obama could have drawn his anti-American foreign policy from Israel’s anti-Zionist foreign policy!

I am not a defeatist. For decades I have offered constructive alternatives to the self-destructive policies of this country. In fact, when I made aliyah in 1976—the year after the UN equated Zionism with “racism”—I brought with me the unheard idea of encouraging Israel to quit the United Nations, and I even gained support for the idea by a politically influential Israeli.

In any event, I have repeatedly proposed an offensive foreign policy, beginning with a serious exposé of the repressive nature of Arab regimes. Alternatively, since Israel was not going to quit the UN, I suggested that Israel submit a proposal in the General Assembly to expel this or that Arab or Islamic regime on grounds of its violation of the UN Charter or the anti-Genocide Convention?

I have often advocated an “ideological offensive” against Israel’s enemies, for example, exposing the hatred of Israel propagated by Egypt’s state-controlled media, which violates the Israel-Egyptian peace treaty.

The Arabs have never ceased their ideological offensive against Israel, playing the “victimization card” or inciting the UN to pass anti-Israel resolutions. Meanwhile, Israel’s political leaders continue to play the role of blind-deaf-mutes.

But what am I saying? Jews must not irritate the “goyim,” certainly not the descendants of Ishmael. Jews much show how magnanimous they are, how peace-loving they are, how long-suffering they are, vis-à-vis their Arab assailants. Yes, Jews must suffer the cruel attacks, the murderous hatred, the obscene lies of the Arabs. The last thing they must do is tell the truth about these compulsive liars, which means they must imitate these Arabs with a good conscience!

Paul Eidelberg
http://www.foundation1.org/

Prof. Eidelberg's latest book:
Toward a Renaissance of Israel and America

available from
www.lightcatcherbooks.com
http://www.lightcatcherbooks.com/products_books_Renaissance.shtml

You might also be interested in these Paul Eidelberg writings:

A Plan for Israel’s Future

This Land is Ours!

Peace Now: The Greatest Enemy of the “Palestinians”

To Hell With the United Nations! Welcome Israel!

Pro-Moslem U.S. Administration Headed by Obama
click on http://tundratabloid.blogspot.com/2009/09/us-led-quartet-mentions-occupation-in.html

The Moslem Jew-haters of the World have gotten themselves a crypto-(secret)-Moslem as the President of the U.S.

Obama, advised by his Jew-hating Jewish lickspittles is dictating to the sovereign State of Israel how "it's going to be" as concerns the wished-for pseudo-state of the so-called "Palestinian" Arabs.

According to Obama and his sycophants, there are to be no Jews in Judea and Samaria (and of course Gaza, which is at this time completely filled with Arab squatters thanks to the Israel Left Kadima crowd).

Using the derogatory term "Settlers" to demean Jews living on Jewish land in Israeli territories, Obama has "forbidden" this practice for now and forever.

The arrogance of this ass-clown is beyond belief. The adage "Pride goeth before a fall*," should be kept in mind by him and his.

Weak as concerns the enemies of the United States, Obama becomes a scold and taskmaster as concerns Israeli Jews.

Although during his rise from obscurity, while he shone like a gilded calf, many Jews, including Israeli Jews, regarded Obama as the longed-for Messiah, the golden idol's feet were found to be of clay--and not firm clay either. He now stands on feet of crumbling clay--his gilding tarnished, his lips tirelessly mouthing carefully crafted phrases obscuring his Alinskyan agenda.

Why this love of so many Jews for this half-ass charlatan? Why this outpouring of love for their self- fashioned "golden child?"

He was the "Chosen One," America's Negro. Finally, these Jews (not to forget the much more numerous other Leftists and Liberals) could show that they were "racially blind." Didn't they support a "black man?" That he was the result of the coming together of a black African Moslem and a white hippie woman was disregarded. He (Obama) came from the "Communities." Didn't he organize the people in them? He had cast his lot with the blacks. He was America's "First Black President."

And the Jews who elevated him to the heights of the Presidency had shown their complete color-blindness.

The "color-blindness" of the Obama-loving Jews and other whites was not returned by the "First Black President."

If there ever was a President trying his best to move a segment of society to the top--at the expense of all other segments, this Obama is the "One."

But, have the American Jews learned? The Israeli Jews have. (I don't know why I have to call Israelis "Israeli Jews?" [To distinguish them from Israeli Arabs? Isn't "Israeli Arab" an oxymoron--a contradiction in terms? I mean, an Israeli is a Jew, an Arab is an Arab. How can there be a Jewish Arab? So, when I refer to Israeli Jews, I shall simply call them "Israelis."] )

Israelis have learned that Obama is NOT A FRIEND OF ISRAEL.

Jews who want--who need Israel to remain wholly Jewish land, should be aware of on whose side Obama is on (the Moslems, because he has never--to anyone's knowledge--renounced Islam, the ideology into which he was born as the son of a Moslem).

As for the so-called "Palestinian" and other Jew-hating Moslems, there are several ways to put a halt to the Moslem-cum-Nazi drive for a final Final Solution to the existence of Jews in the World.

They are outlined by Sultan Knish in his "Winning the War on Terror." I am leaning towards Solution No. 5 as the only defense against the Jew-haters' striving towards eradicating the objects of their ire. The possible alternatives are touched on in What Will Work and What Will Not To Keep Us from Islamic Domination.
___________________
*People who are overconfident or too arrogant are likely to fail. This saying is adapted from the biblical Book of Proverbs.
Definition from The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third EditionCopyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company.Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

Jews Take Their Name from Judea (Yehuda). Obama and Hillary Say No to ANY Jews in Judea!

in a recent lecture in Washington, U.S. Army Lieutenant General Keith Dayton, the American officer charged with training Palestinian military forces in Jordan, made a shocking declaration.

In Ms. Glick's [Jerusalem Post columnist, Caroline Glick] words, "[Gen. Dayton] indicated that if Israel does not surrender Judea and Samaria within two years, the Palestinian forces he and his fellow American officers are now training at a cost of more than $300 million could begin killing Israelis." She went on to note that neither the general nor the Obama administration seemed to find this prospect grounds for rethinking the wisdom of such a training-and-arming program. In fact, her column observed that Defense Secretary Robert Gates "just extended Dayton's tour of duty for an additional two years and gave him the added responsibility of serving as Obama's Middle East mediator George Mitchell's deputy."

Taken together with the U.S. administration's refusal to come to grips with what truly is the most serious threat to peace in the Middle East - Iran's rising power and growing aggressiveness, reflecting in part its incipient nuclear weapons capabilities - the stage is being inexorably set for the next, and perhaps most devastating, regional conflict.

Whether the signals Mr. Obama is sending are intended to communicate such a message or not, they are going to be read by Israel's enemies as evidence of a profound rift between the United States and the Jewish State. In this part of the world, that amounts to an invitation to an open season on Israel.
From Center for Security Policy Jun 01, 2009
By Frank Gaffney, Jr.
via www.actforamerica.org


Netanyahu Hardens Israel's Stance versus Obama-ruled United States

WINSTON MID EAST ANALYSIS & COMMENTARY May 31, 2009 New Email: winston@winstonglobal.org Please disseminate & re-post. If you publish, send us a copy. Many of our articles appear on http://www.gamla.org.il/english, freeman.org & JewishIndy.com
NETANYAHU AT HIS BEST forwarded without comments by Emanuel A. Winston, Middle East Analyst & Commentator
GREAT ANSWER TO THE PROVOCATIVE QUESTION OF THE DAY!!
GREAT HISTORY REVIEW!!
RES IPSA LOQUITUR ! FACTS speak for themselves. Good to know. Isaac Yativ

Subject: NETANYAHU AT HIS BEST.

Even those who aren't particularly sympathetic to Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, could get a good measure of satisfaction from this interview with British Television during the retaliation against Hamas' shelling of Israel.

The interviewer asked him: "How come so many more Palestinians have been killed in this conflict than Israelis?" (A nasty question if there ever was one!)

Netanyahu: "Are you sure that you want to start asking in that direction?"

Interviewer: (Falling into the trap) "Why not?"

Netanyahu: "Because in World War II more Germans were killed than British and Americans combined, but there is no doubt in anyone's mind that the war was caused by Germany's aggression. And in response to the German blitz on London, the British wiped out the entire city of Dresden, burning to death more German civilians than the number of people killed in Hiroshima.

Moreover, I could remind you that in 1944, when the R.A.F. tried to bomb the Gestapo Headquarters in Copenhagen , some of the bombs missed their target and fell on a Danish children's hospital, killing 83 little children. Perhaps you have another question?"

Apparently, Benjamin Netanyahu gave an interview and was asked about Israel's occupation of Arab lands. His response was, "It's our land". The reporter (CNN or the like) was stunned -

read below "It's our land..." It's important information since we don't get fair and accurate reporting from the media and facts tend to get lost in the jumble of daily events.

"CRASH COURSE ON THE ARAB ISRAELI CONFLICT."

Here are overlooked facts in the current & past Middle East situation. These were compiled by a Christian university professor:
BRIEF FACTS ON THE ISRAELI CONFLICT TODAY...(It takes just 15 minutes to read!)
It makes sense and it's not slanted. Jew and non-Jew -- it doesn't matter.

1. Nationhood and Jerusalem.
Israel became a nation in 1312 BCE, Two thousand years before the rise of Islam.

2. Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the modern State of Israel.

3. Since the Jewish conquest in 1272 BCE, the Jews have had dominion over the land for one thousand years with a continuous presence in the land for the past 3,300 years.

4. The only Arab dominion since the conquest in 635 CE lasted no more than 22 years.

5. For over 3,300 years, Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital. Jerusalem has never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even when the Jordanians occupied Jerusalem, they never sought to make it their capital, and Arab leaders did not come to visit.

6. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in Tanach, the Jewish Holy Scriptures.
Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran.

7. King David founded the city of Jerusalem. Mohammed never came to Jerusalem.

8. Jews pray facing Jerusalem. Muslims pray with their backs toward Jerusalem.

9. Arab and Jewish Refugees: in 1948 the Arab refugees were encouraged to leave Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge the land of Jews. Sixty-eight percent left without ever seeing an Israeli soldier.

10. The Jewish refugees were forced to flee from Arab lands due to Arab brutality, persecution and pogroms.

11. The number of Arab refugees who left Israel in 1948 is estimated to be around 630,000.
The number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands is estimated to be [
850,000].

12. Arab refugees were INTENTIONALLY not absorbed or integrated into the Arab lands to which they fled, despite the vast Arab territory. Out of the 100,000,000 refugees since World War II, theirs is the only refugee group in the world that has never been absorbed or integrated into their own people's lands. Jewish refugees were completely absorbed into Israel, a country no larger than the state of New Jersey ..

13. The Arab-Israeli Conflict: the Arabs are represented by eight separate nations, not including the Palestinians. There is only one Jewish nation. The Arab nations initiated [with their aggressive assaults and threats against all Israel 9 wars 1948, 1956, 1967, 1970-71, 1973, 1982, 1991, 2006, 2008-9] and lost. Israel defended herself each time and won.

14. The PLO's Charter [and the mandates of Hamas and Hezb’Allah] still call for the destruction of the State of Israel. Israel has given the Palestinians most of the West Bank land, autonomy under the Palestinian Authority, and has supplied them.

15. Under Jordanian rule, Jewish holy sites were desecrated and the Jews were denied access to places of worship. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian sites have been preserved and made accessible to people of all faiths.

16. The UN Record on Israel and the Arabs: of the 175 Security Council resolutions passed before 1990, 97 were directed against Israel.

17. Of the 690 General Assembly resolutions voted on before 1990, 429 were directed against Israel.

18. The UN was silent while 58 Jerusalem Synagogues were destroyed by the Jordanians.

19. The UN was silent while the Jordanians systematically desecrated the ancient Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives.

20. The UN was silent while the Jordanians enforced an apartheid-like a policy of preventing Jews from visiting the Temple Mount and the Western Wall. These are incredible times. We have to ask what our role should be. What will we tell our grandchildren about what we did when there was a turning point in Jewish destiny, an opportunity to make a difference?


Irony of Ironies!

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

The U.S. State Department Tuesday refused to state whether the Obama administration will honor a promise by the previous government that Israel will retain sovereignty over large Jewish areas in Judea and Samaria, in the event that a new Palestinian Authority state is created.

Now go back to March 1992. The Labor Party was in power. The Likud Central Committed met and elected Benjamin Netanyahu as chairman of the Likud Party—and guess what happened?

A proposal was made from the floor of the meeting, namely:
“A Likud government would not honor any agreement that compromised Israel’s security.”

Mr. Netanyahu rejected this proposal on the grounds that

“A democracy must honor its agreements”!

What About those Arab "Israeli" Lawmakers (Members of Knesset)?

. . . a conference the[Israeli] lawmaker [Ahmed Tibi] attended in Doha last year in which he reportedly registered as a representative for the state of "Palestine" and not Israel. Tibi, who once was an official adviser to late PLO Leader Yasser Arafat, has multiple times represented himself as acting for "Palestine."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=99802

Arabs in Israel, let alone in its Legislative Body

These are not "Israeli." Israel is the only state in which Jews should be able to survive not constantly at risk of dangers ranging from discrimination to murder by those who hate Jews--Nazis, Followers of Mahomet, etc.

Only Jews should be allowed to hold Israeli citizenship. Israeli should mean a member of the people of Israel--who can nowadays be only a Jew.

The swinish Tibi mouthed about Israel being an "apartheid state"

"I asked Tibi if he thinks it appropriate for a Knesset member to be blackening Israel's image by calling it an apartheid state and going around as a paid Knesset member and yet representing himself as from the so-called state of Palestine, which doesn't exist," [ZOA president] Klein said.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=99802

There should be NO (zero) Arab citizens of Israel. And can there be anything worse than a state in which one ethnicity is completely banned from existing: Saudi Arabia--and how many Jews are allowed to live in the Arab part of Israel (Jordan)?

Arab enemies of Israel--in the Knesset or not--should be expelled from the Jewish state. Or . . . what what is it again that traitors deserve? . . .

. . . but not in the compassionate though suicidal state of Israel.

ISRAEL'S RESPONSE TO THE ROADMAP
25 May 2003

As published on the Knesset website

May 25, 2003

1. Both at the commencement of and during the process, and as a condition to its continuance, calm will be maintained. The Palestinians will dismantle the existing security organizations and implement security reforms during the course of which new organizations will be formed and act to combat terror, violence and incitement (incitement must cease immediately and the Palestinian Authority must educate for peace). These organizations will engage in genuine prevention of terror and violence through arrests, interrogations, prevention and the enforcement of the legal groundwork for investigations, prosecution and punishment. In the first phase of the plan and as a condition for progress to the second phase, the Palestinians will complete the dismantling of terrorist organizations (Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front, the Democratic Front Al-Aqsa Brigades and other apparatuses) and their infrastructure, collection of all illegal weapons and their transfer to a third party for the sake of being removed from the area and destroyed, cessation of weapons smuggling and weapons production inside the Palestinian Authority, activation of the full prevention apparatus and cessation of incitement. There will be no progress to the second phase without the fulfillment of all above-mentioned conditions relating to the war against terror. The security plans to be implemented are the Tenet and Zinni plans. [As in the other mutual frameworks, the Roadmap will not state that Israel must cease violence and incitement against the Palestinians].

2. Full performance will be a condition for progress between phases and for progress within phases. The first condition for progress will be the complete cessation of terror, violence and incitement. Progress between phases will come only following the full implementation of the preceding phase. Attention will be paid not to timelines, but to performance benchmarks. (Timelines will serve only as reference points).

3. The emergence of a new and different leadership in the Palestinian Authority within the framework of governmental reform: The formation of a new leadership constitutes a condition for progress to the second phase of the plan. In this framework, elections will be conducted for the Palestinian Legislative Council following coordination with Israel.

4. The Monitoring mechanism will be under American management. The chief verification activity will concentrate upon the creation of another Palestinian entity and progress in the civil reform process within the Palestinian Authority. Verification will be performed exclusively on a professional basis and per issue (economic, legal, financial) without the existence of a combined or unified mechanism. Substantive decisions will remain in the hands of both parties.

5. The character of the provisional Palestinian state will be determined through negotiations between the Palestinian Authority and Israel. The provisional state will have provisional borders and certain aspects of sovereignty, be fully demilitarized with no military forces, but only with police and internal security forces of limited scope and armaments, be without the authority to undertake defense alliances or military cooperation, and Israeli control over the entry and exit of all persons and cargo, as well as of its air space and electromagnetic spectrum.

6. In connection to both the introductory statements and the final settlement, declared references must be made to Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state and to the waiver of any right of return for Palestinian refugees to the State of Israel.

7. End of the process will lead to the end of all claims and not only the end of the conflict.

8. The future settlement will be reached through agreement and direct negotiations between the two parties, in accordance with the vision outlined by President Bush in his 24 June address.

9. There will be no involvement with issues pertaining to the final settlement. Among issues not to be discussed: settlement in Judea, Samaria and Gaza (excluding a settlement freeze and illegal outposts), the status of the Palestinian Authority and its institutions in Jerusalem, and all other matters whose substance relates to the final settlement.

10. The removal of references other than 242 and 338 (1397, the Saudi Initiative and the Arab Initiative adopted in Beirut). A settlement based upon the Roadmap will be an autonomous settlement that derives its validity therefrom. The only possible reference should be to Resolutions 242 and 338, and then only as an outline for the conduct of future negotiations on a permanent settlement.

11. Promotion of the reform process in the Palestinian Authority: A transitional Palestinian constitution will be composed, a Palestinian legal infrastructure will be constructed and cooperation with Israel in this field will be renewed. In the economic sphere: International efforts to rehabilitate the Palestinian economy will continue. In the financial sphere: The American-Israeli-Palestinian agreement will be implemented in full as a condition for the continued transfer of tax revenues.

12. The deployment of IDF forces along the September 2000 lines will be subject to the stipulation of Article 4 (absolute quiet) and will be carried out in keeping with changes to be required by the nature of the new circumstances and needs created thereby. Emphasis will be placed on the division of responsibilities and civilian authority as in September 2000, and not on the position of forces on the ground at that time.

13. Subject to security conditions, Israel will work to restore Palestinian life to normal: promote the economic situation, cultivation of commercial connections, encouragement and assistance for the activities of recognized humanitarian agencies. No reference will be made to the Bertini Report as a binding source document within the framework of the humanitarian issue.

14. Arab states will assist the process through the condemnation of terrorist activity. No link will be established between the Palestinian track and other tracks (Syrian-Lebanese).

From http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=43758
Sunday, May 31, 2009

Background: Israel's conditional acceptance of Roadmap - no commitment to sovereign Palestinian state, settlement freeze conditional

Background: Israel's conditional acceptance of Roadmap - no commitment to
sovereign Palestinian state, settlement freeze conditional
Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA 31 May 2009

In the period up to the critical Sharon Cabinet vote on the Roadmap, the
Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu worked feverishly to draft a set of
Israeli conditions to tack onto Israel's acceptance of the Roadmap proposed
by U.S. President Bush.

When the Cabinet approved the decision - with conditions - Prime Minister
Sharon's office declined to publish the conditions. The text of the
conditions was leaked to IMRA and after it was distributed by IMRA was also
published by Haaretz. For years the Foreign Ministry website featured the
Haaretz article rather than some formal document. Years later, the Knesset
website added the text of the conditions and now the Foreign Ministry
website carries the text with the notation "As published on the Knesset
website."

This remains a bizarre note in Israel's history: the text of a document of
a key cabinet decision in Israel's diplomatic history remains with the
caveat that it is not an official text.

Some features:

#1: No commitment to sovereign Palestinian state:
"5. The character of the provisional Palestinian state will be determined
through negotiations between the Palestinian Authority and Israel. The
provisional state will have provisional borders and certain aspects of
sovereignty, be fully demilitarized with no military forces, but only with
police and internal security forces of limited scope and armaments, be
without the authority to undertake defense alliances or military
cooperation, and Israeli control over the entry and exit of all persons and
cargo, as well as of its air space and electromagnetic spectrum.

...10. ... A settlement based upon the Roadmap will be an autonomous
settlement that derives its validity there. The only possible reference
should be to Resolutions 242 and 338, and then only as an outline for the
conduct of future negotiations on a permanent settlement.

#2: Settlement freeze etc. only after Palestinians first carry out certain
activities:

"1. Both at the commencement of and during the process, and as a condition
to its continuance, calm will be maintained. The Palestinians will dismantle
the existing security organizations and implement security reforms during
the course of which new organizations will be formed and act to combat
terror, violence and incitement (incitement must cease immediately and the
Palestinian Authority must educate for peace)."

http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=43758

POPE CORRECTS GOD OF ISRAEL

Decides Promise Made to Abraham was not Exclusively for Jews

"the realization of the promise made to Abraham is universal in its scope, embracing all men and women, without regard to its origin or its social status"

Click on
Text: Pope tells Grand Mufti of Jerusalem that promise to Abraham is universal [rather than to Jews?]

Photo:
AP Associated Press
Pope Benedict XVI, left, flanked by Prince Ghazi Bin Talal visits King Hussein Bin Talal mosque in Amman, Jordan, Saturday, May 9, 2009.(AP Photo/Pier Paolo Cito)

SOLUTION No. 5

from Winning the War on Terror
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2009/04/winning-war-on-terror.html

. . . where Sultan Knish . . . makes, among eight others, this modest proposal for what to do with those who come to kill us:

5. Kill Them - This one is pretty straightforward. We have the lead in both conventional and non-conventional weapons. Any nation hosting Islamic extremists would have a year to take care of the problem, or we would take care of them. No nation building, just massive destruction aimed at their technological and transportation infrastructure reverting them back to 19th, if not the 18th century.

Pros: It solves much of the problem, especially when combined with a quarantine.

Cons: We would have to be willing to kill millions, directly or indirectly, while maintaining an alliance that would defy Russia, China and the First World nations that would accuse us of genocide. The real name for this war might well turn out to be World War III. It would take a Churchill or a Roosevelt to launch something like that, and while the world would be radically different afterward, it might well turn out to be radioactively different too.

Of course that still beats having out grandchildren grow up as slaves of the Ummah.


For Sultan Knish's other proposed solutions about what we could do with those whose only purpose in life is to kill us, see his Winning the War on Terror
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2009/04/winning-war-on-terror.html

For which one of the Sultan's solutions I (Leslie White) favor, click on

What Will Work and What Will Not To Keep Us from Islamic Domination http://islamicdangerfu.blogspot.com/2009/04/what-will-work-and-what-will-not-to.html

And the Sultan's choice?

In a COMMENT to the post linked immediately above, the Sultan discusses the solution that he favors and reiterates its pros and cons.